Single-unit evidence for eye-blink conditioning in cerebellar cortex is altered, but not eliminated, by interpositus nucleus lesions.
Open Access
- 1 May 1997
- journal article
- Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in Learning & Memory
- Vol. 4 (1) , 88-104
- https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.4.1.88
Abstract
Many theories of motor learning explain learning-related changes in motor behavior in terms of plasticity in the cerebellar cortex. Empirical evidence, however, does not always appear to be consistent with such formulations. It is the anterior cerebellar interpositus nucleus (aINP) that seems to be essential for acquisition and retention of conditioned eye-blink responses under most circumstances and it has been therefore suggested that the aINP is the critical site of learning-related plasticity during eye-blink conditioning. Supporting this conclusion are studies demonstrating that multiple-unit conditioning-related neural activity patterns observed in many brain regions disappear after aINP lesion. The possibility that the cerebellar cortex may be involved in forming these patterns has not been assessed adequately, however. In the current study, trained rabbits received kainic acid lesions of the INP. After recovery, the animals underwent additional sessions of conditioning during which single-unit activity was recorded from the cerebellar cortex. Our results suggest that the aINP is not the sole site of plasticity during eye-blink conditioning, as a subset of the neurons recorded from lesioned animals demonstrated conditioning-related firing patterns. The lesions did change the character of these firing patterns from those observed in saline controls, however, in ways that can be generally described as a loss of organization. The normal tendency for the population of cortical cells to change firing rate together, for instance, was significantly less noticeable in lesioned animals. These results suggest that the aINP may be involved in the production of important features of conditioned responding, such as system timing function, therefore suggesting the need for more models that incorporate aINP and brain stem feedback as integral to the production of organized neural and behavioral responses.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- A theory of cerebellar functionPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Changes in Rabbit Cerebellar Cortical and Interpositus Nucleus Activity during Acquisition, Extinction, and Backward Classical Eyelid ConditioningNeurobiology of Learning and Memory, 1996
- Kinematic analyses of classically-conditioned eyelid movements in the cat suggest a brain stem site for motor learningNeuroscience Letters, 1994
- Neural Network Model of the Cerebellum: Temporal Discrimination and the Timing of Motor ResponsesNeural Computation, 1994
- Possible CS and US pathways for rabbit classical eyelid conditioning: Electrophysiological evidence for projections from the pontine nuclei and inferior olive to cerebellar cortex and nucleiBehavioral and Neural Biology, 1993
- Motor learning in a recurrent network model based on the vestibulo–ocular reflexNature, 1992
- A neural network model of adaptively timed reinforcement learning and hippocampal dynamicsCognitive Brain Research, 1992
- Possible conditioned stimulus pathway for classical eyelid conditioning in rabbits. I. Anatomical evidence for direct projections from the pontine nuclei to the cerebellar interpositus nucleusBehavioral and Neural Biology, 1992
- Acquisition of classical conditioning without cerebellar cortexBehavioural Brain Research, 1989
- The neural basis of basic associative learning of discrete behavioral responsesTrends in Neurosciences, 1988