Contagious Comments: What Was the Online Buzz About the 2011 Quebec Measles Outbreak?
Open Access
- 15 May 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 8 (5) , e64072
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064072
Abstract
Background Although interruption of endemic measles was achieved in the Americas in 2002, Quebec experienced an outbreak in 2011 of 776 reported cases; 80% of these individuals had not been fully vaccinated. We analyzed readers’ online responses to Canadian news articles regarding the outbreak to better understand public perceptions of measles and vaccination. Methods We searched Canadian online English and French news sites for articles posted between April 2011 and March 2012 containing the words “measles” and “Quebec”. We included articles that i) concerned the outbreak or related vaccination strategies; and ii) generated at least ten comments. Two English and two bilingual researchers coded the unedited comments, categorizing codes to allow themes to emerge. Results We analyzed 448 comments from 188 individuals, in response to three French articles and six English articles; 112 individuals expressed positive perceptions of measles vaccination (2.2 comments/person), 38 were negative (4.2 comments/person), 11 had mixed feelings (1.5 comments/person), and 27 expressed no opinion (1.1 comments/person). Vaccine-supportive themes involved the success of vaccination in preventing disease spread, societal responsibility to vaccinate for herd immunity, and refutation of the autism link. Those against measles vaccination felt it was a personal rather than societal choice, and conveyed a distrust of vaccine manufacturers, believing that measles infection is not only safe but safer than vaccination. Commenters with mixed feelings expressed uncertainty of the infection’s severity, and varied in support of all vaccines based on perceived risk/benefit ratios. Conclusion The anti-vaccine minority’s volume of comments translates to a disproportionately high representation on online boards. Public health messages should address concerns by emphasizing that immunization is always a personal choice in Canada, and that the pharmaceutical industry is strictly controlled. Illustrating the dangers of measles through personal stories, rather than scientific data only, may also serve to strengthen messaging.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing Vaccination Sentiments with Online Social Media: Implications for Infectious Disease Dynamics and ControlPLoS Computational Biology, 2011
- The Americas: Paving the Road Toward Global Measles EradicationThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2011
- The Use of Twitter to Track Levels of Disease Activity and Public Concern in the U.S. during the Influenza A H1N1 PandemicPLOS ONE, 2011
- What the Public Was Saying about the H1N1 Vaccine: Perceptions and Issues Discussed in On-Line Comments during the 2009 H1N1 PandemicPLOS ONE, 2011
- Why do I need it? I am not at risk! Public perceptions towards the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 vaccineBMC Infectious Diseases, 2010
- A postmodern Pandora's box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the InternetVaccine, 2010
- An analysis of the Human Papilloma Virus vaccine debate on MySpace blogsVaccine, 2010
- YouTube as a Source of Information on Immunization: A Content AnalysisJAMA, 2007
- Changing attitudes towards polio vaccination: a randomized trial of an evidence-based presentation versus a presentation from a polio survivorVaccine, 2004