The Concept of "Realism" as a Source of Confusion
- 1 March 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Cooperation and Conflict
- Vol. 23 (1) , 1-14
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001083678802300101
Abstract
The discussion of international politics remains preoccupied with a construct called "realist theory". In this article it is first shown that there is confusion in the literature about the substantive contents of "realist theory" and that the thoughts ascribed to this theory tend to be ambiguous, inconsistent, or trivial. It is then argued that three fundamental concerns of international politics theory, which are commonly considered in terms of realism versus idealism, are easier to comprehend if we rid ourselves of this burden and discuss them in their own terms. The three theoretical issues are (1) the explanatory power of anarchy, (2) the immutability of international politics, and (3) the amorality of international politics.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- After HegemonyPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1984
- The poverty of neorealismInternational Organization, 1984
- The richness of the tradition of political realismInternational Organization, 1984
- Realpolitik and the Road to War: An Analysis of Attributes and BehaviorInternational Studies Quarterly, 1983
- Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist SynthesisWorld Politics, 1983
- Philosophers of Peace and WarPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1978
- Images of the World in the Year 2000Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1976