Effective Incorporation of Biomarkers into Phase II Trials
Open Access
- 15 March 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 15 (6) , 1898-1905
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-2033
Abstract
The incorporation of biomarkers into the drug development process will improve understanding of how new therapeutics work and allow for more accurate identification of patients who will benefit from those therapies. Strategically planned biomarker evaluations in phase II studies may allow for the design of more efficient phase III trials and better screening of therapeutics for entry into phase III development, hopefully leading to increased chances of positive phase III trial results. Some examples of roles that a biomarker can play in a phase II trial include predictor of response or resistance to specific therapies, patient enrichment, correlative endpoint, or surrogate endpoint. Considerations for using biomarkers most effectively in these roles are discussed in the context of several examples. The substantial technical, logistic, and ethical challenges that can be faced when trying to incorporate biomarkers into phase II trials are also addressed. A rational and coordinated approach to the inclusion of biomarker studies throughout the drug development process will be the key to attaining the goal of personalized medicine.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Novel Designs and End Points for Phase II Clinical TrialsClinical Cancer Research, 2009
- Considerations for the Use of Imaging Tools for Phase II Treatment Trials in OncologyClinical Cancer Research, 2009
- Recommendations for Collection and Handling of Specimens From Group Breast Cancer Clinical TrialsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Prostate-Specific Antigen: A Misused and Maligned Prostate Cancer BiomarkerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2008
- Biomarkers in Phase I Oncology Trials: Signal, Noise, or Expensive Distraction?Clinical Cancer Research, 2007
- Surrogate biomarkers in evaluating response to anti-angiogenic agents: focus on sunitinibAnnals of Oncology, 2007
- Rationale for Biomarkers and Surrogate End Points in Mechanism-Driven Oncology Drug DevelopmentClinical Cancer Research, 2004
- Specific Keynote: Clinical Trial Design Problems in Ovarian CancerGynecologic Oncology, 2003
- Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: Preferred definitions and conceptual frameworkClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2001
- Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1989