A Critical Analysis of Professional and Academic Publications on Traditional Chinese Medicine in China

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
An open competition for scientific reports on Chinese medicine invited enthusiastic subscriptions of over 10,000 manuscripts. Three categories were separated viz, clinical studies, literature review and laboratory studies. Reports of very high quality were found among the literature review group. Clinical studies appeared to be generally weak; very few follow the evidence-based approach or pass the test of biometa-analysis.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: