Hegemony and the internationalizing state: A post‐colonial analysis of china's integration into Asian corporatism
- 1 March 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Review of International Political Economy
- Vol. 3 (1) , 1-26
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09692299608434343
Abstract
Gramscian globalists presume that internationalization means external‐ization, modernization, and Westernization, thereby enhancing the world‐hegemony of Western liberal capitalism. This paper proposes instead that internationalization mutates the world‐hegemony sometimes into non‐Western, non‐liberal orders of regional‐hegemony. As a case study, this paper focuses on China's internationalization into an Asian Corporatist regional‐hegemony in the 1980s‐1990s.1Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rural Chinese WomenModern China, 1995
- Enterprise Reform in Chinese IndustryJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1994
- Editorial: Forum for heterodox international political economyReview of International Political Economy, 1994
- The hegemonic transition in East Asia: a historical perspectivePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1993
- The Clash of Civilizations?Foreign Affairs, 1993
- Prospects for Civil Society in China: A Case Study of Xiaoshan CityThe Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, 1993
- Exploring a Cultural Borderland: Native American Journeys of Discovery in the Early Twentieth CenturyJournal of American History, 1992
- Industrial governance structures, innovation strategies, and the case of Japan: sectoral or cross-national comparative analysis?International Organization, 1991
- The Concept of Chinese Neo-Authoritarianism: An Exploration and Democratic CritiqueAsian Survey, 1990
- Tiananmen and Chinese Political Culture: The Escalation of Confrontation from Moralizing to RevengeAsian Survey, 1990