Cost-Benefit Analysis and Heart Transplantation
- 9 April 1981
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 304 (15) , 901-903
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198104093041510
Abstract
Amid a flurry of controversy, the trustees of the Massachusetts General Hospital have disallowed heart transplantation by the cardiac surgical service.1 Meanwhile, the Mayo Clinic is establishing a new heart-transplantation program.2 Moribund in the 1970s, the procedure is reviving as a potentially viable clinical option, now that five-year survival rates are exceeding 50 per cent.2 The question, "Can it be done?" has changed to "Should it be done?" with major medical institutions splitting both ways.Cash is the bottom line. In 1972, when Medicare coverage was extended to patients with renal failure, it was "only a question of money." 3 Since . . .Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- What Is CBA/CEA, and Why Are They Doing This to Us?New England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Heart Transplants: To Pay or Not to PayScience, 1980
- The MGH Trustees Say No to Heart TransplantsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Dialysis After Nearly a DecadeScience, 1980
- Foundations of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Health and Medical PracticesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977
- The economic value of human life.American Journal of Public Health and the Nations Health, 1967
- Medical Science under DictatorshipNew England Journal of Medicine, 1949