The US Experience with Local Economic Development
- 1 March 1992
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy
- Vol. 10 (1) , 51-60
- https://doi.org/10.1068/c100051
Abstract
In this paper the increasing intensity of intermunicipal and interstate economic competition in the USA is noted. It is argued that the federal structure of the USA, the present political climate, and the mobility of capital combine to produce a situation of positive feedback leading to everincreasing subsidies. The situation constitutes a classic prisoner's dilemma. Decreased competition would be in the interests of all units of government. However, there is no way that a state or local government can opt out of the competition unilaterally and no mechanism by which collective action can be taken to reduce the intensity of competition. Also considered in this paper are the aggregate effects of local economic development programs in terms of taxes and public expenditures, efficiency, and equity, and several less commonly discussed considerations.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- What Local Economic Developers Actually Do Location Quotients versus Press ReleasesJournal of the American Planning Association, 1990
- State Incentive Packages and the Industrial Location DecisionEconomic Development Quarterly, 1989
- Economic Development IncentivesUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1987
- The Rich Get RicherUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1987
- Political and economic influences on the bureaucratic allocation of federal funds: The case of Urban Development Action GrantsJournal of Urban Economics, 1984
- Hitting The Target: The Distributional Impacts of the Urban Development Action Grant ProgramUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1982
- The economics of choice in the allocation of Federal grants: An empirical testPublic Choice, 1981
- The Subsidization of Industry by Local Communities in the SouthSouthern Economic Journal, 1961