Legal vs. quantified definitions of standards of proof.
- 1 January 1985
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Law and Human Behavior
- Vol. 9 (2) , 159-178
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01067049
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- In search of reasonable doubt: A systematic examination of selected quantification approaches.Law and Human Behavior, 1985
- On the requirements of proof: The timing of judicial instruction and mock juror verdicts.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979
- Death Education: Concerns and CautionsCounseling and Values, 1979
- Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976
- Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal ProcessHarvard Law Review, 1971
- Quantifying Burdens of Proof: A View from the Bench, the Jury, and the ClassroomLaw & Society Review, 1971
- "Beyond a Reasonable Doubt"—An Experimental Attempt at QuantificationThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1970
- An Ounce of Detention: Preventive Justice in the World of John MitchellVirginia Law Review, 1970
- Decision Theory and the Factfinding ProcessStanford Law Review, 1968
- Claims to Territory in International Law and RelationsHarvard Law Review, 1945