Improving Efficiency in Active Surveillance for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus at Hospital Admission
- 1 December 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
- Vol. 31 (12) , 1230-1235
- https://doi.org/10.1086/657335
Abstract
Objective.: Mandatory active surveillance culturing of all patients admitted to Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals carries substantial economic costs. Clinical prediction rules have been used elsewhere to identify patients at high risk of colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). We aimed to derive and evaluate the clinical efficacy of prediction rules for MRSA and VRE colonization in a VA hospital.Design and Setting.: Prospective cohort of adult inpatients admitted to the medical and surgical wards of a 119-bed tertiary care VA hospital.Methods.: Within 48 hours after admission, patients gave consent, completed a 44-item risk factor questionnaire, and provided nasal culture samples for MRSA testing. A subset provided perirectal culture samples for VRE testing.Results.: Of 598 patients enrolled from August 30, 2007, through October 30, 2009, 585 provided nares samples and 239 provided perirectal samples. The prevalence of MRSA was 10.4% (61 of 585) (15.0% in patients with and 5.6% in patients without electronic medical record (EMR)-documented antibiotic use during the past year; P < .01). The prevalence of VRE was 6.3% (15 of 239) (11.3% in patients with and 0.9% in patients without EMR-documented antibiotic use; P < .01 ). The use of EMR-documented antibiotic use during the past year as the predictive rule for screening identified 242.8 (84%) of 290.6 subsequent days of exposure to MRSA and 60.0 (98%) of 61.0 subsequent days of exposure to VRE, respectively. EMR documentation of antibiotic use during the past year identified 301 (51%) of 585 patients as high-risk patients for whom additional testing with active surveillance culturing would be appropriate.Conclusions.: EMR documentation of antibiotic use during the year prior to admission identifies most MRSA and nearly all VRE transmission risk with surveillance culture sampling of only 51% of patients. This approach has substantial cost savings compared with the practice of universal active surveillance.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Value of Performing Active Surveillance Cultures on Intensive Care Unit Discharge for Detection of Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureusInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2007
- Look before You Leap: Active Surveillance for Multidrug-Resistant OrganismsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2007
- Legislative Mandates for Use of Active Surveillance Cultures to Screen for Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureusand Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci: Position Statement From the Joint SHEA and APIC Task ForceInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2007
- Identifying Groups at High Risk for Carriage of Antibiotic-Resistant BacteriaArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2006
- Evaluating the Probability of Previously Unknown Carriage of MRSA at Hospital AdmissionThe American Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Comparison of Mortality Associated with Vancomycin-Resistant and Vancomycin-Susceptible Enterococcal Bloodstream Infections: A Meta-analysisClinical Infectious Diseases, 2005
- Agreement between patient self-report and a Veterans Affairs national pharmacy database for identifying recent exposures to antibioticsPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2003
- Comparison of Mortality Associated with Methicillin‐Resistant and Methicillin‐SusceptibleStaphylococcus aureusBacteremia: A Meta‐analysisClinical Infectious Diseases, 2003
- Cost-Effectiveness of Perirectal Surveillance Cultures for Controlling Vancomycin-ResistantEnterococcusInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2002
- Cost-effectiveness of active surveillance cultures and contact/droplet precautions for control of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusJournal of Hospital Infection, 2002