Fatigue Crack Growth in Epoxy/Aluminum and Epoxy/Steel Joints

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The fatigue crack growth rate within epoxy/aluminum and epoxy/steel joints was evaluated as a function of a) type of surface pretreatment, b) water soak, c) fatigue cycle rate (Hz), d) adhesive thickness and e) type of epoxy adhesive. For both adherends, aluminum and steel, a significant improvement in the fatigue behavior was obtained by use of a mercaptoester coupling agent. After an 8-day, 57°C water soak, the metal surfaces which were pretreated with coupling agent (CA) or by phosphoric acid anodization (PAA) still resulted in cohesive failure, while the controls had higher crack growth rate and showed greater scatter. The room-temperature cure matrix with CA-treated aluminum showed a less dramatic improvement, probably because of a known difference in the application procedure. For the steel joints and room-temperature adhesive the improvement in the fatigue behavior of CA-treated samples was maintained after the 8-day hot water soak. No significant change was found in the fatigue crack growth rate over a frequency range of 1 to 5 Hz, but a significant change was found as a function of the bondline thickness. The room temperature curing adhesive evaluated herein exhibited a much lower fatigue resistance than a heat-cured commercial structural adhesive FM-73.