A Comparative Study of Daily Sperm Production and Testicular Composition in Humans and Rats
Open Access
- 1 June 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Biology of Reproduction
- Vol. 22 (5) , 1233-1243
- https://doi.org/10.1093/biolreprod/22.5.1233
Abstract
Based on enumeration of maturation-phase spermatids in testicular homogenates from adult men and rats, daily sperm production per gram of testicular parenchyma (DSP/g) was almost seven times greater in rats (21.1 ± 0.9 × 106 vs 3.1 ± 0.5 × 106 ; X̄ ± SEM, n = 10). The relative inefficiency of the human testis was uniformly expressed in cranial, equatorial and caudal regions. Furthermore, DSP/g was highly correlated between paired testes from individual men (r = +0.97, n = 10), and differences between paired testes were not significantly different from zero (P>0.4). Histometric analysis of glutaraldehyde-perfused testes revealed differences (P6 in rats (not significantly different from the result by the homogenization method) and 8.5 ± 1.3 × 106 in humans (almost three times higher than the value obtained by the homogenization method). Although the disparity between values for human DSP/g obtained by the two methods cannot yet be explained, several lines of evidence suggest that the time divisor used for human material processed by the homogenization method is too long, thus yielding an underestimation of daily sperm production. While its absolute accuracy is questionable, the homogenization method remains a rapid and precise technique for estimating DSP/g in humans. Histometric analysis and histometric estimation of DSP/g support the concept that the human is less efficient in sperm production than the rat, but these methods suggest that the rat is only about twice as efficient per gram of testicular parenchyma as the human.This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sperm Production RatesPublished by Elsevier ,1970
- Sampling Boar Testes to Study Spermatogenesis Quantitatively and to Predict Sperm ProductionJournal of Animal Science, 1964