Influence‐matrix diagnostic of a data assimilation system
Open Access
- 1 October 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
- Vol. 130 (603) , 2767-2786
- https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.03.205
Abstract
The influence matrix is used in ordinary least‐squares applications for monitoring statistical multiple‐regression analyses. Concepts related to the influence matrix provide diagnostics on the influence of individual data on the analysis—the analysis change that would occur by leaving one observation out, and the effective information content (degrees of freedom for signal) in any sub‐set of the analysed data. In this paper, the corresponding concepts have been derived in the context of linear statistical data assimilation in numerical weather prediction. An approximate method to compute the diagonal elements of the influence matrix (the self‐sensitivities) has been developed for a large‐dimension variational data assimilation system (the four‐dimensional variational system of the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts). Results show that, in the boreal spring 2003 operational system, 15% of the global influence is due to the assimilated observations in any one analysis, and the complementary 85% is the influence of the prior (background) information, a short‐range forecast containing information from earlier assimilated observations. About 25% of the observational information is currently provided by surface‐based observing systems, and 75% by satellite systems.Low‐influence data points usually occur in data‐rich areas, while high‐influence data points are in data‐sparse areas or in dynamically active regions. Background‐error correlations also play an important role: high correlation diminishes the observation influence and amplifies the importance of the surrounding real and pseudo observations (prior information in observation space). Incorrect specifications of background and observation‐error covariance matrices can be identified, interpreted and better understood by the use of influence‐matrix diagnostics for the variety of observation types and observed variables used in the data assimilation system. Copyright © 2004 Royal Meteorological SocietyKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of the AIRS near‐real‐time channel selection for application to numerical weather predictionQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2003
- Nonparametric Hypothesis Testing for a Spatial SignalJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2002
- Channel selection methods for Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer radiancesQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2002
- Diagnosis of background errors for radiances and other observable quantities in a variational data assimilation scheme, and the explanation scheme, and the explanation of a case of poor convergenceQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2000
- The ECMWF operational implementation of four‐dimensional variational assimilation. I: Experimental results with simplified physicsQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2000
- On Measuring and Correcting the Effects of Data Mining and Model SelectionJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1998
- Dynamical structure functions in a four‐dimensional variational assimilation: A case studyQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1996
- Interactions of Dynamics and Observations in a Four-Dimensional Variational AssimilationMonthly Weather Review, 1993
- Four‐Dimensional Assimilation In the Presence of Baroclinic InstabilityQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1992
- Analysis methods for numerical weather predictionQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1986