The Shoe That Didn't Drop: Explaining Banking Stability During the Great Depression
- 1 September 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Economic History
- Vol. 54 (3) , 654-682
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022050700015072
Abstract
This article attempts to account for the exceptional stability exhibited by the banking systems of Britain, Canada, and ten other countries during the Great Depression. It considers three possible explanations of stability—the structure of the commercial banking system, macroeconomic policy and performance, and lender of last resort behavior—employing data from 25 countries across Europe and North America. The results suggest that macroeconomic policy—especially exchange-rate policy—and banking structure, but not lenders of last resort, were systematically responsible for banking stability.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Panic of 1857: Origins, Transmission, and ContainmentThe Journal of Economic History, 1991
- Does Monetary Policy Matter? A New Test in the Spirit of Friedman and SchwartzNBER Macroeconomics Annual, 1989
- Does Monetary Policy Matter? A New Test in the Spirit of Friedman and SchwartzNBER Macroeconomics Annual, 1989
- The bank of France and the sterilization of gold, 1926–1932Explorations in Economic History, 1986
- Before the Glass-Steagall Act: An analysis of the investment banking activities of national banksExplorations in Economic History, 1986
- Exchange Rates and Economic Recovery in the 1930sThe Journal of Economic History, 1985
- Clearinghouses and the Origin of Central Banking in the United StatesThe Journal of Economic History, 1985
- A Reconsideration of the Causes of the Banking Panic of 1930The Journal of Economic History, 1980
- Manias, Panics and CrashesPublished by Springer Nature ,1978
- The Debt-Deflation Theory of Great DepressionsEconometrica, 1933