Reflections on the Nature of Cultural Distributions and the Units of Culture Problem
- 1 May 2001
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Cross-Cultural Research
- Vol. 35 (2) , 227-241
- https://doi.org/10.1177/106939710103500207
Abstract
Does culture have clearly identifiable, distributionally stable parts sufficient to justify the particulate mode of understanding? Is culture composed of elemental units, or is it merely convenient to think this way? And, if culture does not consist of discrete parts, then what? This article suggests that the quest for natural “units of culture” is pretty much a doomed undertaking. There will be no periodic chart for culture grounded in stable, essential properties whether at the level of culture traits and complexes or at the cognitive level of ideas and schemas. On the other hand, various methods of data elicitation can produce replicable and superficially discrete results, which gives some hope for the possibility of a methodological particulatism.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entitiesBehavioral Science, 2007
- The Development of Cognitive AnthropologyPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1995
- IntroductionAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 1987
- Loose Talk: Linguistic Competence and Recognition AbilityAmerican Anthropologist, 1983
- The Cultural Part of CognitionCognitive Science, 1981
- SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE METHOD AND THEORY OF THE KULTURKREISLEHRE1American Anthropologist, 1936
- THE CATTLE COMPLEX IN EAST AFRICA*American Anthropologist, 1926
- BEAR CEREMONIALISM IN THE NORTHERN HEMISPHERE*American Anthropologist, 1926
- The Principle of Limited Possibilities in the Development of CultureJournal of American Folklore, 1913
- On the Principle of Convergence in EthnologyJournal of American Folklore, 1912