Comparison of guinea pig sensitization methods
- 1 December 1976
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Contact Dermatitis
- Vol. 2 (6) , 335-339
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1976.tb03071.x
Abstract
Up to now, different methods in guinea pig sensitization were used, to assess contact sensitization potential of low molecular weight chemicals. In order to compare the efficiency of the epicutaneous, intradermal and combined sensitization methods, two stronger sensitizers, the water soluble chlormethylimidazoline hydrochloride (CMI) and the lipid soluble 1,3-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) were used for the experiments. Eleven modified sensitization methods were performed. In a first trial each substance was tested on 10 animals. In a further study those techniques which had produced the best results, that is the highest degree of sensitization, were applied to 25 to 30 animals. For comparison of the results of the various methods, a mean sensitization index was calculated. The best results were achieved with the Maximization Test of Magnusson & Kligman (1969) and the Split Adjuvant Technique of Maguire & Chase (1967).Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Squaric‐acid‐diethylester ‐ a strong sensitizerContact Dermatitis, 1976
- The Identification of Contact Allergens by Animal Assay. the Guinea Pig Maximization Test**From the Department of Dermatology, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Sjukhuset, Gothenburg, Sweden and the Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 1969
- Exaggerated Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity to Simple Chemical Allergens in the Guinea Pig*Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 1967
- Delayed Contact Hypersensitivity In the Guinea PigArchives of Dermatology, 1965
- STUDIES ON THE SENSITIZATION OF ANIMALS WITH SIMPLE CHEMICAL COMPOUNDSThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1935