Randomised trial comparing biweekly oxaliplatin plus oral capecitabine versus oxaliplatin plus i.v. bolus fluorouracil/leucovorin in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: results of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology study 0401
- 22 August 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Zeitschrift für Krebsforschung und Klinische Onkologie
- Vol. 135 (2) , 217-226
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-008-0454-7
Abstract
Oxaliplatin combined with either fluorouracil/leucovorin (OXAFAFU) or capecitabine (OXXEL) has a demonstrated activity in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. We aimed at comparing these two regimens in terms of response rate (RR), safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and quality of life (QoL) of patients. A total of 322 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were randomized to receive biweekly: oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 orally twice daily from day 1 to day 11 (OXXEL); or oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1; 6S-leucovorin 250 mg/m2 i.v. and fluorouracil 850 mg/m2 i.v. on day 2 (OXAFAFU). Eleven complete and 42 partial responses were registered with OXXEL (RR = 34%); six complete and 48 partial responses were obtained with OXAFAFU (RR = 33%) (P = 0.999). Severe adverse events were less frequent (32 vs. 43%) with OXXEL, which also reduced the occurrence of severe neutropenia (10 vs. 27%) and febrile neutropenia (6 vs. 13%), but produced more gastric side effects (8 vs. 3%) and diarrhea (13 vs. 8%). QoL did not differ across the two arms. Median PFS was 6.6 months in the OXXEL, and 6.5 months in the OXAFAFU arm (HR = 1.12, P = 0.354). Median overall survival was 16.0 and 17.1 months (HR = 1.01, P = 0.883). OXXEL and OXAFAFU regimens were equally active in metastatic colorectal cancer. The choice should be based on patient preference and on pharmacoeconomic evaluations.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Safety and Efficacy of Oxaliplatin and Fluoropyrimidine Regimens With or Without Bevacizumab As First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results of the TREE StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Should Capecitabine Replace Infusional Fluorouracil and Leucovorin When Combined With Oxaliplatin in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer?Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (xelox) versus protracted 5-fluorouracil venous infusion plus oxaliplatin (pvifox) as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer: A GOAM phase II randomised study (FOCA trial)European Journal Of Cancer, 2006
- Patient preference for oral or intravenous chemotherapy: A randomised cross-over trial comparing capecitabine and Nordic fluorouracil/leucovorin in patients with colorectal cancerEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2006
- The clinical and economic benefits of capecitabine and tegafur with uracil in metastatic colorectal cancerBritish Journal of Cancer, 2006
- Pharmacoeconomic analysis of adjuvant oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-FU/LV in Dukes' C colon cancer: the X-ACT trialBritish Journal of Cancer, 2006
- A randomised cross-over trial comparing patient preference for oral capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin regimens in patients with advanced colorectal cancerAnnals of Oncology, 2005
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of Fluorouracil Plus Leucovorin, Irinotecan, and Oxaliplatin Combinations in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- A chronopharmacologic phase II clinical trial with 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin using an ambulatory multichannel programmable pump. High antitumor effectiveness against metastatic colorectal cancerCancer, 1992
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958