The importance of conducting and reporting pilot studies: the example of the Scottish Births Survey
Top Cited Papers
- 9 May 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Vol. 34 (3) , 289-295
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01757.x
Abstract
The importance of conducting and reporting pilot studies: the example of the Scottish Births Survey Background. In many research papers, pilot studies are only reported as a means of justifying the methods. This justification might refer to the overall research design, or simply to the validity and reliability of the research tools. It is unusual for reports of pilot studies to include practical problems faced by the researcher(s). Pilot studies are relevant to best practice in research, but their potential for other researchers appears to be ignored. Objective. The primary aim of this study was to identify the most appropriate method for conducting a national survey of maternity care. Methods. Pilot studies were conducted in five hospitals to establish the best of four possible methods of approaching women, distributing questionnaires and encouraging the return of these questionnaires. Variations in the pilot studies included (a) whether or not the questionnaires were anonymous, (b) the staff involved in distributing the questionnaires and (c) whether questionnaires were distributed via central or local processes. For this purpose, five maternity hospitals of different sizes in Scotland were included. Results. Problems in contacting women as a result of changes in the Data Protection Act (1998) required us to rely heavily on service providers. However, this resulted in a number of difficulties. These included poor distribution rates in areas where distribution relied upon service providers, unauthorized changes to the study protocol and limited or inaccurate information regarding the numbers of questionnaires distributed. Conclusions. The pilot raised a number of fundamental issues related to the process of conducting a large‐scale survey, including the method of distributing the questionnaire, gaining access to patients, and reliance on ‘gatekeepers’. This paper highlights the lessons learned as well as the balancing act of using research methods in the most optimal way under the combined pressure of time, ethical considerations and the influences of stakeholders. Reporting the kinds of practical issues that occur during pilot studies might help others avoid similar pitfalls and mistakes.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- A national survey of women's views of their maternity care in ScotlandMidwifery, 2000
- Differentiating between audit and research: postal survey of health authorities' viewsBMJ, 1999
- Non‐response in survey research: a methodological discussion and development of an explanatory modelJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1999
- Dutch midwives: relational care and birth locationHealth & Social Care in the Community, 1999
- Psychological effect of witnessed resuscitation on bereaved relativesThe Lancet, 1998
- Women's priorities for care before and after deliveryBritish Journal of Midwifery, 1998
- The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventionsJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1998
- The Role of Pilot Studies in the Economic Evaluation of Health TechnologiesInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1998
- Disseminating research results-the challenge of bridging the gap between health research and health actionHealth Promotion International, 1994
- The Potential Uses of Pilot WorkNursing Research, 1989