Comparison of triggering systems for neonatal patient triggered ventilation.
Open Access
- 1 April 1991
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by BMJ in Archives of Disease in Childhood
- Vol. 66 (4 Spec No) , 426-428
- https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.66.4_spec_no.426
Abstract
The efficacy of two triggering systems was compared during neonatal patient triggered ventilation: the Graseby MR10 respiration monitor and airway pressure changes. Ten preterm infants were studied, median gestational age 33 weeks (range 28-35). Patient triggered ventilation was administered via the SLE ventilator at a series of inflation times (0.24, 0.3, and 0.4 seconds). Comparison was made between the trigger systems of the trigger delay, inflation volume delivered, and proportion of spontaneous respiratory efforts detected. The airway pressure trigger gave a superior performance: at the two lower inflation times the trigger delay was shorter and inflation volume delivered greater. At the longest inflation time a greater proportion of respiratory efforts were detected. We conclude the airway pressure trigger should be used in preference to the respiration monitor as the triggering system of choice for neonatal patient triggered ventilation.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Limitations of patient triggered ventilation in neonates.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1989
- Neonatal patient triggered ventilation.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1988
- PATIENT-TRIGGERED VENTILATION PREVENTS PNEUMOTHORAX IN PREMATURE BABIESThe Lancet, 1988
- Patient triggered ventilation in premature neonates.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1988
- Performance of respirators at fast rates commonly used in neonatal intensive care unitsPediatric Pulmonology, 1987
- Monitoring spontaneous respiration in the ventilated neonate.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1986
- Interaction of spontaneous respiration with artificial ventilation in preterm babiesThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1983