Randomized clinical trial of transabdominal versus transcervical chorionic villus sampling methods

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The relative advantages and disadvantages of transabdominal (TA) and transcervical (TC) chorionic villus sampling (CVS) in terms of fetal risks and efficacy were evaluated in a clinical trial conducted on 1194 women randomized at 7–12 weeks' gestation. The results of the study indicate that, if any, the relative risk of fetal loss following either procedure is less than double that of the alternative technique when performed by a skilled operator. Overall, the fetal loss rate (spontaneous abortions following randomization, terminations of pregnancy, and perinatal deaths) is 16.5 and 15.5 per cent, respectively, among women allocated to TA‐ and TC‐CVS. The two procedures are equally effective, although TA‐CVS is associated with a significantly lower rate of repeat device insertions; on the other hand, a higher weight of chorionic tissue is obtained, on average, with TC‐CVS. Bleeding is more common following TC‐CVS, while peritoneal reaction developed only after TA‐CVS. No diagnostic problems specifically related to one sampling technique were identified.