Assessing the minimal important difference in symptoms: A comparison of two techniques
- 30 November 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier
- Vol. 49 (11) , 1215-1219
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00206-5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can there be a more patient-centred approach to determining clinically important effect sizes for randomized treatment trials?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1994
- Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaireJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1994
- Assessing the clinical importance of symptomatic improvements. An illustration in rheumatologyArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1993
- Measuring Health-Related Quality of LifeAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1993
- Indexes and boundaries for “quantitative significance” in statistical decisionsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1990
- Measurement of health statusControlled Clinical Trials, 1989
- Measuring functional status in chronic lung disease: conclusions from a randomized control trialRespiratory Medicine, 1989
- Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health.Psychological Bulletin, 1988
- A measure of quality of life for clinical trials in chronic lung disease.Thorax, 1987
- When was a "negative" clinical trial big enough? How many patients you needed depends on what you foundArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1985