A Comparative Analysis on the Incidence of Peritonitis and Exit-Site Infection in Capd and Automated Peritoneal Dialysis
Open Access
- 1 May 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Peritoneal Dialysis International
- Vol. 19 (3) , 253-258
- https://doi.org/10.1177/089686089901900311
Abstract
Objective: To compare the incidence of peritonitis and exit-site infection in an ample group of patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and automated peritoneal dialysis in a single center during a 10-year period. Design: Nonrandomized, prospective study. Setting: Public, tertiary care hospital providing peritoneal dialysis care to a population of (approximately) 750 000 people. Patients: We studied 213 patients on CAPD and 115 on automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) starting therapy between January 1989 and August 1998, with a minimum follow-up of 3 months. Main Outcome Measures: Using a multivariate approach, we compared the incidence, clinical course, and outcome of peritonitis and exit-site infections in both groups, controlling for other risk factors for the complications studied. Results: The incidence of peritonitis was higher in CAPD than in APD (adjusted difference 0.20 episodes/ patient/year, 95% confidence interval 0.08 – 0.32). There was a trend for CAPD patients to present earlier with peritonitis than APD patients, yet the incidence of and survival to the first exit-site infection were similar in both groups. The etiologic spectrum of infections displayed minor differences between groups. Automated PD patients were more frequently hospitalized for peritonitis, but otherwise, the complications and outcome of peritonitis and exit-site infections did not differ significantly between patients on CAPD and those on APD. Conclusions: Automated PD is associated with a lower incidence of peritonitis than is CAPD, while exit-site infection is similarly incident under both modes of therapy. The etiologic spectrum, complications, and outcome of peritonitis and exit-site infection do not differ markedly between CAPD and APD. Prevention of peritonitis should be included among the generic advantages of APD over CAPD.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Exit Site Infections: Prevention, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Future DirectionsSeminars in Dialysis, 2007
- Influence of different automated peritoneal dialysis schedules on solute and water removal.Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 1998
- Potential Problem: Delayed Detection of Peritonitis by Patients Receiving Home Automated Peritoneal Dialysis (Apd)Peritoneal Dialysis International, 1997
- Will Automated Peritoneal Dialysis be the Answer?Peritoneal Dialysis International, 1997
- The role of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) in an integrated dialysis programmeBritish Medical Bulletin, 1997
- Peritonitis in an urban peritoneal dialysis program: An analysis of infecting pathogensAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 1995
- Optimal Approach to the Prevention and Treatment of Peritonitis in Children Undergoing Continuous Ambulatory and Continuous Cycling Peritoneal DialysisSeminars in Dialysis, 1994
- Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Carriers in Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis With Mupirocin: Long-term ResultsAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 1993
- Ciprofloxacin in the Treatment of Gram-Positive Bacterial Peritonitis in Patients Undergoing CAPDPeritoneal Dialysis International, 1991
- Continuous Cycling Peritoneal Dialysis Is Associated With Lower Rates of Catheter Infections Than Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal DialysisAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 1990