Trunk kinematics of one-handed lifting, and the effects of asymmetry and load weight
- 1 February 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Ergonomics
- Vol. 39 (2) , 322-334
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139608964462
Abstract
This study investigated trunk kinematic differences between lifts performed using either one hand (unsupported) or two hands. These effects were studied while beginning the lifts from different asymmetric starting positions and while lifting different load weights. Each subject lifted a box from a lower to an upper platform under one- and two-handed lifting conditions. Subjects wore a lumbar spine electrogoniometer, from which relative motion components were calculated in the trunk's three cardinal planes. Results of this study showed that one-handed lifting resulted in significantly higher ranges of motion in the lateral and transverse planes and greater flexion in the sagittal plane. Back motion characteristics previously found to be associated with low back disorders were all significantly higher for one-handed lifts. The two-handed lift technique, on the other hand, produced overall faster trunk motions in the sagittal plane and equal or larger acceleration and deceleration magnitudes in all planes of motion. Increases in load asymmetry affected trunk kinematics, in that magnitude values for range of motion, velocity and acceleration became much greater with increasingly asymmetric load positions. Increasing the load weight appeared to have less of an effect on trunk kinematics, with increases in position mostly occurring during sagittal and lateral bending. These results suggest that unsupported one-handed lifting loads the spine more than two-handed lifts, due to the added coupling. Applying these results to a previously developed model, one-handed lifting was also found to increase one's risk of suffering a low back disorder.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Role of Dynamic Three-Dimensional Trunk Motion in Occupationally-Related Low Back DisordersSpine, 1993
- Accuracy of a three-dimensional lumbar motion monitor for recording dynamic trunk motion characteristicsInternational Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 1992
- Three dimensional dynamic motor performance of the normal trunkInternational Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 1990
- Maximum acceptable weights and maximum voluntary isometric strengths for asymmetric liftingErgonomics, 1986
- Back Injuries in Industry: A Retrospective StudySpine, 1986
- A dynamic biomechanical evaluation of lifting maximum acceptable loadsJournal of Biomechanics, 1984
- An epidemiologic study of lifting and twisting on the job and risk for acute prolapsed lumbar intervertebral discJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 1984
- Physiological Responses to One-handed Lift in the Horizontal Plane by Female WorkersAihaj Journal, 1983
- Maximum frequency acceptable to female workers for one-handed lifts in the horizontal planeErgonomics, 1982
- Epidemiologic Aspects on Low-Back Pain in IndustrySpine, 1981