Evaluation of the E test for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria
- 1 October 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 29 (10) , 2197-2203
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.29.10.2197-2203.1991
Abstract
The susceptibilities of 105 clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria were determined by a new method, the E test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden), and were compared with the MICs for these organisms obtained by the reference agar dilution method by using supplemented brucella and Wilkins-Chalgren agars. The E test is a plastic strip with a predefined antibiotic gradient immobilized on one side and a MIC interpretive scale printed on the other side. Strips with cefoxitin, cefotaxime, imipenem, penicillin, metronidazole, and clindamycin were used in this study. A suspension of the test strain equal to the visual turbidity of a no. 0.5 McFarland standard was prepared and swabbed onto a 150-mm-diameter plate. The strips were applied in a radial fashion, and the plates were incubated under anaerobic conditions. After growth had occurred, an ellipse of inhibition was seen around each strip. At the point of intersection of the ellipse with the strip, the MIC was read from the interpretive scale. For most antibiotic-organism combinations, the ellipse was clear and the endpoint was sharp. The E-test MICs were interpreted after overnight and 48-h incubation for 58 of the strains. After overnight incubation, 87% of the E-test MICs were within 1 dilution of the agar dilution MICs, and 98% were within 2 dilutions. After 48 h of incubation, agreement was 86 and 97% respectively. E-test MICs obtained for the Bacteroides fragilis group after overnight incubation were more comparable than those obtained after 48 h of incubation to agar dilution MICs determined at 48 h for all drugs except clindamycin. On brucella agar, there was a 2% categorical discrepancy rate between the E-test MICs and agar dilution MICs, which occurred mostly with cefoxitin. The E test is easy to perform and read, is suitable for all anaerobes, can be used to test single patient isolates as needed, and offers the laboratory a reliable method for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fastidious anaerobe agar compared with Wilkins-Chalgren agar, brain heart infusion agar, and brucella agar for susceptibility testing of Fusobacterium speciesAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1990
- In-vitro sensitivity tests and in-vivo efficacy of cephalosporins against Bacteroides fragilisJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1990
- Multilaboratory Evaluation of an Agar Diffusion Disk Susceptibility Test for Rapidly Growing Anaerobic BacteriaClinical Infectious Diseases, 1990
- Cell-wall-defective variants of FusobacteriumAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1989
- Therapeutic implications of bacteriologic findings in mixed aerobic-anaerobic infectionsAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1988
- Disk diffusion susceptibility testing of the Bacteroides fragilis groupAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1987
- Evaluation of broth disk elution methods for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria with the newer beta-lactam antibioticsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1986
- Mechanisms of Resistance and Resistance Transfer in Anaerobic Bacteria: Factors Influencing Antimicrobial TherapyClinical Infectious Diseases, 1984
- Aerobically Incubated Thioglycolate Broth Disk Method for Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of AnaerobesAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1976
- Susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis to Six Antibiotics Determined by Standardized Antimicrobial Disc Susceptibility TestingAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1973