The molecular genetics and morphometry‐based endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia classification system predicts disease progression in endometrial hyperplasia more accurately than the 1994 World Health Organization classification system
Open Access
- 26 April 2005
- Vol. 103 (11) , 2304-2312
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21058
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of disease progression prediction of the molecular genetics and morphometry‐based Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia (EIN) and World Health Organization 1994 (WHO94) classification systems in patients with endometrial hyperplasias. METHODS A multicenter, multivariate analysis was conducted on 477 patients with endometrial hyperplasia who were required to have a 1‐year minimum disease‐free interval from the time of the index biopsy (1–18 years of follow‐up). The results from that analysis were compared with the results from 197 patients who had < 1 year of follow‐up. RESULTS Twenty‐four of 477 hyperplasias (5.0%) progressed to malignant disease over an average of 4 years (maximum, 10 years). According to the WHO94 classification, 16 of 123 atypical hyperplasias (13%) and 8 of 354 nonatypical hyperplasias (2.3%) progressed (hazard ratio [HR] = 7). Twenty‐two of 118 EINs (19%) and 2 of 359 non‐EINs (0.6%) progressed (HR = 45). EIN was prognostic within each WHO94 subcategory. Progression rates were 3% in simple hyperplasias, 22% in complex hyperplasias, 17% in simple atypical hyperplasias, and 38% in complex atypical hyperplasias with EIN, compared with progression rates of 0.0–2.0% in all hyperplasias if EIN was absent. EIN detected precancerous lesions (sensitivity, 92%) better than WHO94 atypical hyperplasias collectively (67%) or complex atypical hyperplasias alone (46%). In a Cox regression analysis, EIN was the strongest prognostic index of future endometrial carcinoma. The same was true for patients with < 1 year of follow‐up (HR for EIN, atypical hyperplasia, and complex atypical hyperplasia: 58, 7, and 8, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The EIN classification system predicted disease progression more accurately than the WHO94 classification and identified many women with benign changes that would have been regarded as high risk according to the WHO94 classification system. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prediction of endometrial carcinoma by subjective endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosisLaboratory Investigation, 2004
- Prospective Multicenter Validation Confirms the Prognostic Superiority of the Endometrial Carcinoma Prognostic Index in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage 1 and 2 Endometrial CarcinomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Computerised morphometrical analysis in endometrial hyperplasia for the prediction of cancer development. A long term retrospective study from northern NorwayJournal of Clinical Pathology, 2000
- Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia (EIN): Will It Bring Order to Chaos?Gynecologic Oncology, 2000
- Does Hysteroscopy Improve upon the Sensitivity of Dilatation and Curettage in the Diagnosis of Endometrial Hyperplasia or Carcinoma?Gynecologic Oncology, 1998
- Use of computerized morphometric analyses of endometrial hyperplasias in the prediction of coexistent cancerAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- The additional prognostic value of morphometric nuclear arrangement and DNA-ploidy to other morphometric and stereologic features in endometrial hyperplasiasInternational Journal of Gynecologic Cancer, 1994
- Architectural and nuclear morphometrical features together are more important prognosticators in endometrial hyperplasias than nuclear morphometrical features aloneThe Journal of Pathology, 1988
- Discrimination of hyperplasia and carcinoma of the endometrium by quantitative microscopy–a feasibility studyHistopathology, 1981
- Quantitative nuclear image analysis: differentiation between normal, hyperplastic, and malignant appearing uterine glands in a paraffin section IV. The use of Markov chain texture features in discriminant analysisEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1978