The World Health Organization histologic classification system reflects the oncologic behavior of thymoma
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 31 January 2002
- Vol. 94 (3) , 624-632
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10226
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the histologic classification of thymic epithelial tumors has been confusing and controversial, an agreement on the universal classification system for thymic epithelial tumors was achieved by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1999. The authors previously reported that the WHO histologic classification system reflects invasiveness and immunologic function of thymic epithelial tumors. In this subsequent study, they examined the prognostic significance of this classification system. METHODS Clinical features as well as postoperative survival of patients with thymoma, but not thymic carcinoma, were examined with reference to WHO histologic classification based on an experience with 273 patients over a 44‐year period. RESULTS There were 18 type A tumors, 77 type AB tumors, 55 type B1 tumors, 97 type B2 tumors, and 26 type B3 tumors. In patients with type A, AB, B1, B2, and B3 tumors, the respective proportions of invasive tumor were 11.1%, 41.6%, 47.3%, 69.1%, and 84.6%; the respective proportions of tumors with involvement of the great vessels were 0%, 3.9%, 7.3%, 17.5%, and 19.2%; and the respective 20‐year survival rates were 100%, 87%, 91%, 59%, and 36%. According to the Masaoka staging system, the 20‐year survival rates were 89%, 91%, 49%, 0%, and 0% in patients with Stage I, II, III, IVa, and IVb disease, respectively. By multivariate analysis, the Masaoka staging system and the WHO histologic classification system were significant independent prognostic factors, whereas age, gender, association with myasthenia gravis, completeness of resection, or involvement of the great vessels were not significant independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that histologic appearance reflects the oncologic behavior of thymoma when the WHO classification system is adopted. The WHO classification system may be helpful in clinical practice for the assessment and treatment of patients with thymoma. Cancer 2002;94:624–32. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10225Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recurrent Genetic Aberrations in Thymoma and Thymic CarcinomaThe American Journal of Pathology, 2000
- Thymic Carcinoma: Current Staging Does Not Predict PrognosisThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1998
- Characterization of the Human Thymic Microenvironment: Lymphoepithelial Interaction in Normal Thymus and Thymoma.Archives of Histology and Cytology, 1997
- Prognostic factors and long-term results after thymoma resection: A series of 307 patientsThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1996
- Thymoma: A multivariate analysis of factors predicting survivalThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995
- Thymoma: Results of 241 operated casesThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1991
- Myasthenia Gravis with Thymoma: Analysis of and Postoperative Prognosis for 65 Patients with Thymomatous Myasthenia GravisThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1984
- Primary thymic carcinomasThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1982
- Thymic carcinomaThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1982
- Squamous cell carcinoma of the thymus. An analysis of eight casesThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1977