On the Role and Significance of Fas (Apo-1/CD95) Ligand (FasL) Expression in Immune Privileged Tissues and Cancer Cells Using Multiple Myeloma as a Model*
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Leukemia & Lymphoma
- Vol. 31 (5-6) , 477-490
- https://doi.org/10.3109/10428199809057607
Abstract
Our knowledge in immunology has been dramatically increased by several excellent investigations elucidating the role of the Fas (Apo-1/CD95) receptor/ligand (FasL) system in complex immunological processes such as the acquisition of self tolerance in T cells, progression of autoimmunity, clonal deletion of activated T cells, B-cell regulation and the establishment of “immune privileged” sites such as testis or retina. In addition to these regulatory immunological activities, Fas/FasL interaction was also shown to participate in active defense mechanisms of the host against infected or transformed cells thereby inducing apoptosis in target cells. However, the same mechanism seems also to be part of an escape strategy utilized by tumor cells in various neoplastic malignancies of both hematopoetic as also non-hematopoe-tic origin. We ourselves were able to demonstrate that neoplastic plasma cell lines, as well as native malignant myeloma cells constitutively express FasL mRNA and protein. The FasL molecule is functionally active and able to induce programmed cell death in Fas sensitive target T cells in vitro.These target T cells were protected from programmed cell death by preincubation of T cells with a Fas-blocking monoclonal antibody (mAb) or of myeloma cells with a FasL-neutralizing mAb. respectively. Furthermore, overexpression of the caspase inhibitor, cowpoxvirus protein CrmA, also protected target T cells from being killed by myeloma cells, identifying Fas/FasL mediated signaling as the effector pathway utilized by malignant plasma cells. Our observations strongly suggest the engagement of Fas/FasL interaction in the escape strategy of this malignancy. The molecular basis of this evasive mechanism differs in essential respects from those described in melanoma, lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, or astrocytoma, since downregulation of Fas or instrinsic insensitivity towards Fas-mediated signaling were not prerequisites for the occurence of this phenomenon in Fas-sensitive multiple myeloma cell lines. However, myeloma cell lines resisted cocultivation with FasL-expres-sing target T cells in vitro.The aim of this review is to discuss the role of Fas/FasL interaction in the establishment of malignant disease, in the light of our findings on myeloma cells and also by drawing upon similar observations of other investigators on different kinds of tumor cells and cell lines and further to consider its possible relevance in formulating novel approaches to cancer therapy.Keywords
This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fas and FasL in the homeostatic regulation of immune responsesPublished by Elsevier ,2001
- FLICE, A Novel FADD-Homologous ICE/CED-3–like Protease, Is Recruited to the CD95 (Fas/APO-1) Death-Inducing Signaling ComplexCell, 1996
- Induction of Apoptosis by Apo-2 Ligand, a New Member of the Tumor Necrosis Factor Cytokine FamilyJournal of Biological Chemistry, 1996
- Fas and Fas ligand in embryos and adult mice: ligand expression in several immune-privileged tissues and coexpression in adult tissues characterized by apoptotic cell turnover.The Journal of cell biology, 1996
- A role for CD95 ligand in preventing graft rejectionNature, 1995
- Local Fas/APO‐1 (CD95) ligand‐mediated tumor cell killing in vivoEuropean Journal of Immunology, 1995
- Fas antigen signals proliferation of normal human diploid fibroblast and its mechanism is different from tumor necrosis factor receptorFEBS Letters, 1995
- Lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity: Two pathways and multiple effector moleculesImmunity, 1994
- Molecular cloning and expression of the fas ligand, a novel member of the tumor necrosis factor familyCell, 1993
- ORTHOTOPIC CORNEAL TRANSPLANTATION IN MICE—EVIDENCE THAT THE IMMUNOGENETIC RULES OF REJECTION DO NOT APPLYTransplantation, 1992