Real‐Time Model Uncertainty in the United States: The Fed, 1996–2003
- 13 September 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Money, Credit and Banking
- Vol. 39 (7) , 1533-1561
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2007.00078.x
Abstract
We study 30 vintages of FRB/US, the principal macro‐model used by the Federal Reserve Board staff for forecasting and policy analysis. We document the surprisingly large and consequential changes in model properties that occurred during the period from July 1996 to November 2003 and compute optimal Taylor‐type rules for each vintage. Model uncertainty is shown to be a substantial problem; the efficacy of purportedly optimal policy rules should not be taken on faith. We also find that previous findings that simple rules are robust to model uncertainty may be an overly sanguine conclusion.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Monetary Policy in Real TimeSSRN Electronic Journal, 2005
- The Performance of Forecast-Based Monetary Policy Rules Under Model UncertaintyAmerican Economic Review, 2003
- The Unreliability of Output-Gap Estimates in Real TimeThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 2002
- Monetary Policy with Uncertain ParametersThe Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 2002
- DOES MODEL UNCERTAINTY JUSTIFY CAUTION? ROBUST OPTIMAL MONETARY POLICY IN A FORWARD-LOOKING MODELMacroeconomic Dynamics, 2002
- Is the Fed Too Timid? Monetary Policy in an Uncertain WorldThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 2001
- The evolution of macro models at the Federal Reserve BoardCarnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1997
- A comparison of some basic monetary policy regimes for open economies: implications of different degrees of instrument adjustment and wage persistenceCarnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1993
- Discretion versus policy rules in practiceCarnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1993
- Robustness properties of a rule for monetary policyCarnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1988