Audited Financial Reporting and Voluntary Disclosure as Complements: A Test of the Confirmation Hypothesis
- 30 June 2011
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
We examine the “confirmation” hypothesis, that audited, backward-looking financial outcomes and disclosure of managers’ private forward-looking information are complements, because independent audit disciplines and hence enhances disclosure credibility. Committing to higher audit fees (a measure of the extent of financial outcome verification and thus the accuracy and freedom from manipulation of reported outcomes), is associated with management forecasts that are more frequent, specific, timely and accurate, and receive a larger market reaction. These relations are not driven by litigation risk and are robust to various tests. Private information disclosure and audited financial reporting are complements and cannot be evaluated separately.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is financial reporting shaped by equity markets or by debt markets? An international study of timeliness and conservatismReview of Accounting Studies, 2008
- Financial Reporting and Supplemental Voluntary DisclosuresJournal of Accounting Research, 2007
- Does earnings guidance affect market returns? The nature and information content of aggregate earnings guidanceJournal of Accounting and Economics, 2007
- The Association between Outside Directors, Institutional Investors and the Properties of Management Earnings ForecastsJournal of Accounting Research, 2005
- CEO Incentives and Firm SizeJournal of Labor Economics, 2004
- Infrastructure Requirements for an Economically Efficient System of Public Financial Reporting and DisclosureBrookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services, 2001
- The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earningsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 2000
- Testing for complementarities in reduced-form regressions: A noteEconomics Letters, 1996
- The jointness of audit fees and demand for MAS: A self‐selection analysis*Contemporary Accounting Research, 1990
- An Empirical Evaluation of Accounting Income NumbersJournal of Accounting Research, 1968