Secondary Prevention After Myocardial Infarction
- 8 February 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of internal medicine (1960)
- Vol. 153 (3) , 285-288
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1993.00410030005001
Abstract
MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (MI) is a major sequela of coronary artery disease and carries an adverse prognosis for life. Each year more than 1 million Americans suffer from MI, and about 70% survive the acute event. The survivors of MI remain at risk for reinfarction and death. The subsequent prognosis of these patients is related to the extent and location of MI, left ventricular dysfunction, arrhythmia, and residual ischemia. Several large clinical trials have been conducted in an effort to alter the prognosis after MI. These trials have evaluated effects of calcium-channel blockers,1-12β-blockers,13-24nitrates,25-27antiplatelet therapy, antiarrhythmic drugs,28-30risk factor modification,31-35and myocardial revascularization. Of these, only a few have demonstrated beneficial effects in the period after MI. Actually, some studies1-8,28-30have shown deleterious effects of treatment used for secondary prevention. The results of the second Secondary Prevention Reinfarction Israel Nifedipine Trial (SPRINT 2)This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of verapamil on mortality and major events after acute myocardial infarction (The Danish Verapamil Infarction Trial II — DAVIT II)The American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- Preliminary Report: Effect of Encainide and Flecainide on Mortality in a Randomized Trial of Arrhythmia Suppression after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- The Effect of Diltiazem on Mortality and Reinfarction after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Timolol-Induced Reduction in Mortality and Reinfarction in Patients Surviving Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981