The AIDS Litigation Project
- 18 April 1990
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 263 (15) , 2086-2093
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1990.03440150094033
Abstract
EVERY major government,1,2 medical,3,4 public health,5 and legal6,7 organization to issue a report on the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic has condemned discrimination because it violates basic tenets of individual justice and is detrimental to the public health. Discrimination based on an infectious condition is just as inequitable as discrimination based on race, gender, or handicap. In each case, people are treated inequitably not because they lack inherent ability, but solely because of a status over which they have no control. Complex and often pernicious mythologies develop about the nature, cause, and transmission of disease. As the Supreme Court has recognized, "society's accumulated myths and fears about disability and disease are just as handicapping as are the physical limitations that flow from actual impairment. Few aspects of handicap give rise to the same level of public fear and misapprehension as contagiousness."8 Persons infected with HIVKeywords
This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- AIDS: The Ethical Dilemma for SurgeonsLaw, Medicine and Health Care, 1989
- Education and the Prevention of AIDSLaw, Medicine and Health Care, 1988