BSCC terminology for cervical cytology: two or three tiers? Why not five, seven or even 14?
- 28 September 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Cytopathology
- Vol. 15 (5) , 245-251
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2303.2004.00193.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Level of agreement and biopsy correlation using two‐ and three‐tier systems to grade cervical dyskaryosisCytopathology, 2004
- An audit of cervical smears reported to contain atypical glandular cellsCytopathology, 2004
- The cervical cancer epidemic that screening has prevented in the UKThe Lancet, 2004
- Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significanceAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2003
- Do borderline nuclear changes in gynaecological cytlogy constitute a reliable reporting category?Cytopathology, 2002
- How predictive is a cervical smear suggesting glandular neoplasia?Cytopathology, 2002
- Histologic Findings After a Colposcopic Biopsy Showing CIN2Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, 2002
- Management of Colposcopy Patients with Biopsy-Proven Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 1Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, 1999
- Review human papillomaviruses (HPV) in gynaecological cytology: from molecular biology to clinical testingCytopathology, 1995
- PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF RISK OF CERVICAL CANCER AFTER CYTOLOGICAL EVIDENCE OF HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTIONThe Lancet, 1986