Research on deer taxonomy and its relevance to management
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Écoscience
- Vol. 10 (4) , 432-442
- https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.2003.11682791
Abstract
Taxonomic classifications are based on phylogenetic relationships, which can be inferred from paleontological, morphological, or genetic data. In this paper, I describe recent molecular genetic data that contribute to the understanding of taxonomic and phylogenetic relationships of the Cervidae at the family, species, subspecies, and population levels. At higher taxonomic levels, the relationships of cervids have been inferred from several molecular genetic markers. Mitochondrial DNA and nuclear DNA sequences (e.g., casein genes) have been used to infer the relationships of Cervidae to other artiodactyl families and the relationships among cervid subfamilies, genera, and species. The data used in such analyses can be extended to practical management applications such as forensic species identification. DNA sequences and allele frequencies of proteins and microsatellite loci can also be used to infer relationships among congeneric species, subspecies, and populations. Understanding relationships at these lower taxonomic levels is useful in several management contexts. Species relationships are important in cases where interspecific competition or hybridization may be important, as with white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and mule deer (O. hemionus) in western North America. Quantification of the genetic differentiation among subspecies and populations is useful for identification of management units and inference of the extent of common ancestry and gene flow. Caribou (Rangifer tarandus granti) and domestic reindeer (R. t. tarandus) are discussed as an example of subspecies that remain genetically differentiated 110 y after the introduction of domestic reindeer to wild caribou ranges in Alaska. Genetic data also show that four wild caribou herds in Arctic Alaska comprise one interbreeding population, although each herd has a different calving range. The concepts of subspecies, populations, and other intra-specific taxa are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 76 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fight or flight? Antipredator behavior and the escalation of coyote encounters with deerOecologia, 2002
- Phylogenetic status of North American wapiti( Cervus elaphus) subspeciesCanadian Journal of Zoology, 1998
- K-Casein Gene Phylogeny of Higher Ruminants (Pecora, Artiodactyla)Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 1996
- White-Tailed Deer Restoration to the Southeastern United States: Evaluating Genetic VariationThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1994
- Antlerless females among reindeer and caribouCanadian Journal of Zoology, 1993
- Kappa‐casein polymorphisms among cattle breeds and bison herdsAnimal Genetics, 1993
- Temporal, Spatial, and Age-Specific Changes in Genotypic Composition of Mule DeerJournal of Mammalogy, 1991
- Hind Limbs of Eocene Basilosaurus: Evidence of Feet in WhalesScience, 1990
- Genetic and Morphologic Comparisons of Red Brocket, Brown Brocket, and White-Tailed DeerJournal of Mammalogy, 1986
- Characterization of Sympatric or Adjacent Habitats of 2 Deer Species in West TexasThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1986