QR Obeys Superiority: Frozen Scope and ACD
- 1 April 2001
- journal article
- Published by MIT Press in Linguistic Inquiry
- Vol. 32 (2) , 233-273
- https://doi.org/10.1162/00243890152001762
Abstract
The phenomenon of “frozen scope” in double object and spray-load constructions is shown to hold robustly across contexts, constructions, and quantifier types. Nevertheless, frozen scope is not absolute, holding only between two objects but not between an object and a subject or an object and some other operator. The rigidity of two object quantifiers follows the pattern of multiple instances of movement cross linguistically (multiple wh-movement, multiple A-scrambling, multiple object shift): movement paths cross, recreating the hierarchical order of the moving elements (Richards 1997). Hypothesizing that quantifier scope is derived by quantifier-specific syntactic movement, movement that is constrained in the same way as other types of movement, permits these phenomena to be unified under accounts of Relativized Minimality effects generally.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Economy and scopeNatural Language Semantics, 1995
- Locative Inversion and the Architecture of Universal GrammarLanguage, 1994
- THE MORPHOLOGY AND DISTRIBUTION OF OBJECT CLITICS IN WEST FLEMISHStudia Linguistica, 1993
- Questions with quantifiersNatural Language Semantics, 1992
- The position of subjectsLingua, 1991
- Object positionsNatural Language & Linguistic Theory, 1991
- NEGATIVE HEADS AND THE NEG CRITERIONThe Linguistic Review, 1991
- UNERGATIVES AS COPULAR VERBS; LOCATIONAL AND EXISTENTIAL PREDICATIONThe Linguistic Review, 1990
- On multiple questions and multiple WH frontingNatural Language & Linguistic Theory, 1988
- Predication and ProLanguage, 1987