Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to Social Research in Human Geography—An Impossible Mixture?
- 1 February 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
- Vol. 30 (2) , 261-276
- https://doi.org/10.1068/a300261
Abstract
The author addresses the potential of a multiple-methods approach in human geography, an approach to social research which has received little explicit attention in the geographical literature to date. The relationship between epistemology and methodology is outlined, and the similarities and differences between quantitative and qualitative methods are described. Some problems surrounding subjectivity and objectivity in social research are also discussed. In addition, the relationship between methods and to whom the research is communicated is considered. It is hoped that the paper will stimulate future discussion both of the theoretical implications and of the practical use of a mixed-methods approach in human geography.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multiple Strategies in Field ResearchPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2010
- The experience of poverty and disadvantage in rural ScotlandScottish Geographical Magazine, 1996
- Deprivation, poverty and marginalization in rural lifestyles in England and WalesJournal of Rural Studies, 1995
- Postmodernism and the possibility of a new human geographyScottish Geographical Magazine, 1995
- Probable Writing: Derrida, Deconstruction, and the Quantitative Revolution in Human GeographyEnvironment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 1994
- Prediction and Predictability in Geographical SystemsTransactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1994
- Postmodern Human Geography. A preliminary assessmentErdkunde, 1994
- Boys TownEnvironment and Planning D: Society and Space, 1991
- The Postmodern Challenge: Reconstructing Human GeographyTransactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1988
- Is Statistix Inferens the Geographical Name for a Wild Goose?Economic Geography, 1970