Psychosocial functioning in the obese before and after weight reduction: construct validity and responsiveness of the Obesity-related Problems scale
- 17 April 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in International Journal of Obesity
- Vol. 27 (5) , 617-630
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802272
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Obesity-related Problems scale (OP) is a self-assessment module developed to measure the impacts of obesity on psychosocial functioning. Our principal aim was to evaluate the construct validity and responsiveness of the OP scale. Our specific aims were to test: (1) the psychometric performance of OP; (2) if OP scores differed by gender and weight category; (3) if OP scores are inversely related to mental well-being; (4) if weight reduction in the obese is accompanied by improvements in psychosocial functioning (OP). SUBJECTS: Four samples were used: 6863 subjects in the SOS cross-sectional study; 2128 in the SOS intervention study; 1017 nonobese in the SOS reference study; and 3305 obese subjects in the XENDOS study. MEASUREMENTS: Psychosocial functioning was measured by OP. Overall mood was measured by MACL. Anxiety and depression symptoms were measured by HAD. RESULTS: Psychometric testing provided strong support for the construct validity of OP. Factor analysis confirmed the homogeneity of the construct and multitrait/multi-item scaling analysis demonstrated strong item-convergent/discriminant validity. Reliability coefficients were high and floor and ceiling effects were small. Psychometric results were cross-validated and replicated in subgroups by gender, age and body mass index (BMI). As expected, large differences in OP were observed between obese and nonobese (PPPPP<0.0001). A distinct dose–response effect between weight reduction and improvements in OP was demonstrated. Scores on psychosocial functioning (OP) and mental well-being (MACL, HAD) in nonobese (BMI<30) surgical patients at 4-y follow-up were equal to scores observed in nonobese reference subjects (NS). CONCLUSION: OP is a psychometrically valid obesity-specific measure suitable for evaluating HRQL effects of obesity interventions. The negative impact of obesity on psychosocial functioning is considerable and disturbances are connected with poor mental well-being. Weight reduction in the obese is followed by improvements in both psychosocial functioning and mental well-being.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of overweight and obesity on health-related quality of life—a Swedish population studyInternational Journal of Obesity, 2002
- "Specific" scale compared with "generic" scale: a double measurement of the quality of life in a French community sample of obese subjectsJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1998
- The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey—I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in SwedenSocial Science & Medicine, 1995
- Assessing Impact of Weight on Quality of LifeObesity Research, 1995
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of Data Quality, Scaling Assumptions, and Reliability Across Diverse Patient GroupsMedical Care, 1994
- Morbidly Obese Patientsʼ Perceptions of Social Discrimination Before and After Surgery for ObesitySouthern Medical Journal, 1990
- Measurement of health statusControlled Clinical Trials, 1989
- Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain.Psychological Bulletin, 1986
- The Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1983
- Common methodological problems in factor analytic studies.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978