Three Pillars of Welfare State Theory
- 1 February 2000
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in European Journal of Social Theory
- Vol. 3 (1) , 23-50
- https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310022224660
Abstract
Current social and political theory is sceptical of the future of welfare states in the face of global markets. Their moral claims, too, have been challenged by the neo-liberal association of market capitalism and individual freedom and by an implicit acceptance of that critique - of the welfare state as bureaucratic - by left-wing commentators. This article offers a defence of the national welfare state as the guarantor of `complex freedom'. This defence is derived from the theoretical contributions of Marshall, Polanyi and Myrdal and offers a reconsideration of the debate immediately after the second world war over the welfare state and its relevance today. Marshall's concept of social rights has become a familiar part of our own debate, but it is argued that Polanyi provides the rigorous critique of market relationships which is missing, and Myrdal locates gender issues as central to the understanding of welfare state development and women's rights as integral to social rights.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Death of ClassCapital & Class, 1997
- Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?Published by National Bureau of Economic Research ,1996
- The Other T. H. MarshallJournal of Social Policy, 1995
- W(h)ither Welfare?Work, Employment & Society, 1991
- Women, Economic Dependency and CitizenshipJournal of Social Policy, 1990
- The Crisis of Fordism or the Crisis of Social-Democracy?Telos, 1990
- Ruling Class Strategies and CitizenshipSociology, 1987
- The reconstruction of the supply side of the labour market: the relative autonomy of social reproductionCambridge Journal of Economics, 1984
- The Family WageFeminist Review, 1980
- Toward A Restatement of Demographic Transition TheoryPopulation and Development Review, 1976