Interpretation of variations in outcome in audit of clinical interventions
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The Lancet
- Vol. 355 (9197) , 4-5
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(99)00349-9
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interpretation of operative risks of individual surgeonsThe Lancet, 1999
- More doctors face suspension as managers flex their musclesBMJ, 1998
- How should doctors respond to the CMC's judgments on Bristol?The Lancet, 1998
- Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST)The Lancet, 1998
- Effect of correcting outcome data for case mix: an example from stroke medicineBMJ, 1996
- A Systematic Review of the Risks of Stroke and Death Due to Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid StenosisStroke, 1996
- Is self-audit reliable?The Lancet, 1995
- Variation in outcome after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhageThe Lancet, 1995
- Volume and outcome in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: true association or artefact?BMJ, 1995
- Randomized versus historical controls for clinical trialsThe American Journal of Medicine, 1982