ADVERTISING AND PRODUCT QUALITY IN POSTED‐OFFER EXPERIMENTS
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Economic Inquiry
- Vol. 28 (1) , 39-56
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1990.tb00802.x
Abstract
Sellers selected both price and quality but buyers had limited information about those choices in the experiments reported here. Market efficiency was high under full information with truthful advertising of prices and qualities, but was much lower with no advertising of price or quality. Efficiency did not improve when sellers were permitted to advertise price, but not quality, and in half of these experiments “lemons” outcomes occurred. Although the range of outcomes is great, it cannot be claimed that price advertising improves efficiency when quality is unknown.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Exercise of Market Power in Laboratory ExperimentsThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1989
- Price Advertising and the Deterioration of Product QualityThe Review of Economic Studies, 1988
- Monopolistic Competition with Experience GoodsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1986
- Product Quality Signaling in Experimental MarketsEconometrica, 1985
- A Comparison of Posted-Offer and Double-Auction Pricing InstitutionsThe Review of Economic Studies, 1984
- Prices, Product Qualities and Asymmetric Information: The Competitive CaseThe Review of Economic Studies, 1984
- Prices and Qualities in Markets with Costly InformationThe Review of Economic Studies, 1982
- MARKET STRUCTURE, DURABILITY, AND QUALITY: A SELECTIVE SURVEYEconomic Inquiry, 1979
- An Experimental Examination of Two Exchange InstitutionsThe Review of Economic Studies, 1978
- The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market MechanismThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1970