On the pragmatics of contrast
- 1 June 1990
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Child Language
- Vol. 17 (2) , 417-431
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000900013842
Abstract
In this paper, I review properties and consequences of the PRINCIPLE OF CONTRAST. This principle, which I have argued from the beginning has a pragmatic basis, captures facts about the inferences speakers and addresses make for both conventional and novel words. Along with a PRINCIPLE OF CONVENTIONALITY, it accounts for the pre-emption of novel words by well-established ones. And it holds just as much for morphology as it does for words and larger expressions. In short, Contrast has the major properties Gathercole (1989) proposed as characteristic of her alternative to Contrast.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Contrast: a semantic constraint?Journal of Child Language, 1989
- The linguistic marking of agentivity and control in child languageJournal of Child Language, 1989
- From discourse to semantics: the development of verb morphology and forms of self-reference in the speech of a two-year-oldJournal of Child Language, 1988
- Acquiring word meanings via linguistic contrastCognitive Development, 1987
- Coining complex compounds in English: affixes and word order in acquisitionLinguistics, 1986
- Productivity and memory for newly formed wordsJournal of Child Language, 1984
- The Iconicity of Grammar: Isomorphism and MotivationLanguage, 1980
- The Acquisition of Noun and Verb InflectionsChild Development, 1968
- Adjectives in English: Attribution and predicationLingua, 1967
- Subjunctive -ra and -se: "Free Variation"?Hispania, 1956