Intensional models for first degree formulas
- 1 June 1967
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Symbolic Logic
- Vol. 32 (1) , 1-22
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2271239
Abstract
In Anderson and Belnap [8] there was developed a semantics for first degree entailments (fde), i.e., entailments A → B between formulas A and B involving only truth-functions (defined in terms of “or” and “not”) and quantifiers. The key ideas were (i) the notion of a frame ⟨P, FIP, I⟩, where P is a set of (intensional) propositions closed under negation and multiple disjunction, I is a domain of individuals, and FIP is the set of functions from I into P; and (ii) the semantic relation of cons (consequence), as obtaining between a set of propositions taken conjunctively, and a set taken disjunctively; and (iii) the notion of an atomic frame, i.e., a frame generated by a set of propositions X closed under negation, such that for any disjoint subclasses Y and Z of X, Y does not bear cons to Z.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Decision Procedure For the System EĪ of Entailment with NegationMathematical Logic Quarterly, 1965
- Foundations of Mathematical LogicThe Mathematical Gazette, 1964
- First degree entailmentsMathematische Annalen, 1963
- Tautological entailmentsPhilosophical Studies, 1962
- EnthymemesThe Journal of Philosophy, 1961
- EQ and the First Order Functional CalculusMathematical Logic Quarterly, 1960
- Completeness Theorems for the Systems E of Entailment and EQ of Entailment with QuantificationMathematical Logic Quarterly, 1960
- A formal analysis of entailmentPublished by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1960