Genetic profiling of dendritic cells exposed to live‐ or ultraviolet‐irradiated Chlamydia muridarum reveals marked differences in CXC chemokine profiles
Open Access
- 18 December 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Immunology
- Vol. 120 (2) , 160-172
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2567.2006.02488.x
Abstract
Chlamydia trachomatis is a major cause of sexually transmitted disease worldwide for which an effective vaccine is being actively pursued. Current vaccine efforts will be aided by elucidating the interaction between Chlamydia and dendritic cells (DCs). Protective immunity appears to develop slowly following natural infection in humans, and early vaccine trials using inactivated C. trachomatis resulted in partial, short-lived protection with possible enhanced inflammatory pathology during re-infection. Thus, immunity following natural infection with live chlamydia may differ fundamentally from immune responses induced by immunization with inactivated chlamydia. We explored this conjecture by studying the response of DCs exposed to either viable or inactivated [ultraviolet (UV) –irradiated] chlamydia elementary bodies (EBs; designated as Live-EB and UV-EB, respectively) using Affymetrix GeneChip microarrays. Thirty-one immunologically characterized genes were differentially expressed by DCs following exposure to Live-EB or UV-EB, including two glutamic acid–leucine–arginine cysteine–X–cysteine (ELR CXC) neutrophil chemoattractant chemokines, Cxcl1 (KC), and Cxcl2 (MIP-2). Up-regulation of these genes by Live-EB as compared to UV-EB was verified by quantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction and increased chemokine secretion was confirmed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay both in vitro and in vivo. Immunofluorescence and fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis of chlamydia-infected lung tissue confirmed that Live-EB but not UV-EB induced significant DC and neutrophil infiltration during infection. These observations demonstrate that the development of an antichlamydial immune response is dramatically influenced by chlamydial viability. This has implications as to why early inactivated chlamydial vaccines were ineffective and suggests that new vaccine design efforts may benefit from in vitro DC screening for ELR chemokine expression profiles.Keywords
This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Unexpected Impact of aChlamydia trachomatisInfection Control Program on Susceptibility to ReinfectionThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2005
- Infection of epithelial and dendritic cells byChlamydia trachomatisresults in IL-18 and IL-12 production, leading to interferon-γ production by human natural killer cellsFEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology, 2005
- Leishmania majorModulates Chemokine and Chemokine Receptor Expression by Dendritic Cells and Affects Their Migratory CapacityInfection and Immunity, 2005
- Live Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) elicit dendritic cell responses that differ from those induced by killed S. TyphimuriumVeterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, 2004
- Interleukin-12 and the regulation of innate resistance and adaptive immunityNature Reviews Immunology, 2003
- Dendritic Cells Pulsed with a Recombinant Chlamydial Major Outer Membrane Protein Antigen Elicit a CD4+Type 2 Rather than Type 1 Immune Response That Is Not ProtectiveInfection and Immunity, 2002
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1–Infected Women Exhibit Reduced Interferon‐γ Secretion afterChlamydia trachomatisStimulation of Peripheral Blood LymphocytesThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2000
- Risk Factors for Chlamydia trachomatis Pelvic Inflammatory Disease among Sex Workers in Nairobi, KenyaThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1996
- Non-ulcerative sexually transmitted diseases as risk factors for HIV-1 transmission in womenAIDS, 1993
- Generation of large numbers of dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow cultures supplemented with granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor.The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1992