Meaningful change in cancer-specific quality of life scores: Differences between improvement and worsening
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Quality of Life Research
- Vol. 11 (3) , 207-221
- https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015276414526
Abstract
Introduction: There has been increased recent attention to the clinical meaningfulness of group change scores on health-related quality of life (HRQL) questionnaires. It has been assumed that...Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instrumentsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendationsPublished by Elsevier ,2000
- Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy—lung (FACT-L) quality of life instrumentPublished by Elsevier ,1995
- Quality of life: Concepts and definitionJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 1994
- Measurement of health statusControlled Clinical Trials, 1989
- Responsiveness and validity in health status measurement: A clarificationJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1989
- Statistical Problems in the Reporting of Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies.Health Psychology, 1985
- Psychological response of patients cured of advanced cancerCancer, 1976
- A note on the analysis of repeated measurements of the same subjectsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1962