Clinical review: Clinical management of atrial fibrillation – rate control versus rhythm control
Open Access
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Critical Care
- Vol. 8 (4) , 271-279
- https://doi.org/10.1186/cc2827
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation: An AFFIRM substudy of the first antiarrhythmic drugJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2003
- A Comparison of Rate Control and Rhythm Control in Patients with Recurrent Persistent Atrial FibrillationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- A Comparison of Rate Control and Rhythm Control in Patients with Atrial FibrillationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- ABC of antithrombotic therapy: Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillationBMJ, 2002
- Atrial FibrillationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Comparison of intravenous flecainide, propafenone, and amiodarone for conversion of acute atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythmThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2000
- Emergency Management of Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter: Intravenous Diltiazem Versus Intravenous DigoxinAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1997
- Ventricular control and exercise performance in chronic atrial fibrillation: Effects of diltiazem verapamilJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1990
- Effects of nadolol on the spontaneous and exercise-provoked heart rate of patients with chronic atrial fibrillation receiving stable dosages of digoxinAmerican Heart Journal, 1984
- Inefficacy of digitalis in the control of heart rate in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation: Beneficial effect of an added beta adrenergic blocking agentThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1979