Neural Network Using Combined Urine Nuclear Matrix Protein-22, Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 and Urinary Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 to Detect Bladder Cancer
- 1 March 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 169 (3) , 917-920
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000051322.60266.06
Abstract
We developed a neural network to identify patients with bladder cancer more effectively than hematuria and cytology. The algorithm is based on combined urine levels of nuclear matrix protein-22, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and urinary intercellular adhesion molecule-1. A randomized double-blinded study of voided urine from 253 patients undergoing outpatient cystoscopy was performed. Of the patients 27 had bladder cancer on biopsy and 5 had muscle invasion. Urine tumor markers were measured using sandwich-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. Urine from patients with bladder cancer on cystoscopy was compared to urine from controls with negative cystoscopy results. An algorithm was created with 3 sets of cutoff values modeled to be 100% sensitive for superficial bladder cancer, 100% specific for superficial cancer and 100% specific for muscle invasive cancer, respectively. We compared our model to hematuria and cytology. For the hematuria dipstick test sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 92.6%, 51.8%, 18.7% and 98.2%, respectively. For atypical cytology sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 66.7%, 81%, 29.5% and 95.3%, respectively. For the sensitive model set sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 100%, 75.7%, 32.9% and 100%, respectively. For the specific model set sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 22.2%, 100%, 100% and 91.5%, respectively. For the muscle invasive model set sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 80%, 100%, 100% and 99.6%, respectively. The standard bladder tumor evaluation of 253 patients costs $61,054 but $36,450 using our model. Our algorithm is superior to conventional screening tests for bladder cancer. The model identifies patients who require cystoscopy, those with bladder cancer and those with muscle invasive disease. It provides possible savings over current screening methods. The potential loss of other information by not performing cystoscopy was not evaluated in our study.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Novel Artificial Neural Network for Early Detection of Prostate CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Novel Artificial Neural Network for Early Detection of Prostate CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- FOUR BLADDER TUMOR MARKERS HAVE A DISAPPOINTINGLY LOW SENSITIVITY FOR SMALL SIZE AND LOW GRADE RECURRENCEJournal of Urology, 2002
- Artificial neural networksCancer, 2001
- COMPARATIVE SENSITIVITY OF URINARY CYFRA 21-1, URINARY BLADDER CANCER ANTIGEN, TISSUE POLYPEPTIDE ANTIGEN AND NMP22 TO DETECT BLADDER CANCERJournal of Urology, 1999
- NMP22 IS A SENSITIVE, COST-EFFECTIVE TEST IN PATIENTS AT RISK FOR BLADDER CANCERJournal of Urology, 1999
- Potential value of urinary intercellular adhesion molecule-1 determination in patients with bladder cancerUrology, 1998
- Urinary levels of monocyte chemo‐attractant protein‐1 correlate with tumour stage and grade in patients with bladder cancerBritish Journal of Urology, 1998
- Cancer statistics, 1996CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1996