A bridge too far? The problems facing GNVQ
- 1 September 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Curriculum Journal
- Vol. 5 (3) , 323-336
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0958517940050305
Abstract
General National Vocational Qualifications (GNVQs) have been introduced by the British government to complete post‐16 education and training provision. They are intended to be a bridge between Advanced Levels and National Vocational Qualifications (NVQs), and to provide a vocational education of equivalent status to A levels. Using business as an exemplar, we examine the contextual position of GNVQs, especially in relation to A levels and NVQs. We identify three related problems–status equivalence, links with other qualifications and progression routes. We suggest that, in striving for status equivalence, GNVQ is being pulled closer to A level, and is increasingly distanced from NVQs. Moreover, despite much recent effort, progression from GNVQ to university remains problematic, while little attention has been given to the arguably more significant problems of progression to employment. We conclude that GNVQ is being expected to do an impossible job, and that changes to Advanced Level are also needed if a coherent post‐16 educational provision is to be developed.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Empowerment as an entitlement in the post‐16 curriculumJournal of Curriculum Studies, 1994
- A curriculum for the 21st century? Towards a new basis for overcoming academic/vocational divisionsBritish Journal of Educational Studies, 1993
- NCVQ and the 16‐19 CurriculumBritish Journal of Education & Work, 1991