Large‐Scale Evaluation of Enzyme‐Linked Immunospot Assay and Skin Test for Diagnosis ofMycobacterium tuberculosisInfection against a Gradient of Exposure in The Gambia

Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The purified protein derivative (PPD) skin test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection lacks specificity. We assessed 2 more specific M. tuberculosis antigens (ESAT-6 and CFP-10) by enzyme-linked immunospot assay (ELISPOT) compared with PPD by ELISPOT and skin test in The Gambia. Of 735 household contacts of 130 sputum smear—positive tuberculosis cases, 476 (65%) tested positive by PPD ELISPOT, 300 (41%) tested positive by PPD skin test, and 218 (30%) tested positive by ESAT-6/CFP-10 ELISPOT. Only 15 (2%) had positive ESAT-6/CFP-10 results and negative PPD results by ELISPOT. With increasing M. tuberculosis exposure, the percentage of subjects who were PPD skin test positive/ESAT-6/CFP-10 ELISPOT negative increased (P < .001), whereas the percentage of subjects who were PPD skin test negative/PPD ELISPOT positive decreased (P = .011). Eighteen (31%) ESAT-6/CFP-10 ELISPOT–positive subjects in the lowest exposure category had negative PPD skin test results. ESAT-6/CFP-10 ELISPOT probably offers increased specificity in the diagnosis of M. tuberculosis infection in this tropical setting of endemicity, at the cost of some sensitivity.

This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit: