Improved breast cancer prognosis through the combination of clinical and genetic markers
- 26 November 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Bioinformatics
- Vol. 23 (1) , 30-37
- https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl543
Abstract
Motivation: Accurate prognosis of breast cancer can spare a significant number of breast cancer patients from receiving unnecessary adjuvant systemic treatment and its related expensive medical costs. Recent studies have demonstrated the potential value of gene expression signatures in assessing the risk of post-surgical disease recurrence. However, these studies all attempt to develop genetic marker-based prognostic systems to replace the existing clinical criteria, while ignoring the rich information contained in established clinical markers. Given the complexity of breast cancer prognosis, a more practical strategy would be to utilize both clinical and genetic marker information that may be complementary. Methods: A computational study is performed on publicly available microarray data, which has spawned a 70-gene prognostic signature. The recently proposed I-RELIEF algorithm is used to identify a hybrid signature through the combination of both genetic and clinical markers. A rigorous experimental protocol is used to estimate the prognostic performance of the hybrid signature and other prognostic approaches. Survival data analyses is performed to compare different prognostic approaches. Results: The hybrid signature performs significantly better than other methods, including the 70-gene signature, clinical makers alone and the St. Gallen consensus criterion. At the 90% sensitivity level, the hybrid signature achieves 67% specificity, as compared to 47% for the 70-gene signature and 48% for the clinical makers. The odds ratio of the hybrid signature for developing distant metastases within five years between the patients with a good prognosis signature and the patients with a bad prognosis is 21.0 (95% CI:6.5–68.3), far higher than either genetic or clinical markers alone. Availability: The breast cancer dataset is available at Author Webpage and Matlab codes are available upon request. Contact: sun@dsp.ufl.edu Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicting the prognosis of breast cancer by integrating clinical and microarray data with Bayesian networksBioinformatics, 2006
- Molecular Classification and Molecular Forecasting of Breast Cancer: Ready for Clinical Application?Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- The RhoGAP Protein DLC-1 Functions as a Metastasis Suppressor in Breast Cancer CellsCancer Research, 2005
- “Good Old” clinical markers have similar power in breast cancer prognosis as microarray gene expression profilersEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2004
- Meeting Highlights: Updated International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Preferentially Expressed Antigen of Melanoma (PRAME) in the Development of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Methods for Hematological MalignanciesLeukemia & Lymphoma, 2003
- A Gene-Expression Signature as a Predictor of Survival in Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancerNature, 2002
- National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer, November 1-3, 2000JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2001
- pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long‐term follow‐upHistopathology, 1991