Randomized placebo-controlled comparative study of nifedipine, verapamil and isosorbide dinitrate in the treatment of angina at rest
- 1 January 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Heart Journal
- Vol. 7 (1) , 67-76
- https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061960
Abstract
Twenty-nine patients with angina at rest took part in a randomized placebo-controlled short-term study to assess the relative effectiveness of different dosages of nifedipine (N), verapamil (V) and isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) versus placebo and to evaluate the antianginal effects of a sustained-release preparation of ISDN (sr), of N retard form (r) and of V retard form (r). The 29 patients were divided into 3 groups: the first group of patients (10 patients, group A) was treated with N10 mg six times daily, V 80 mg three times daily and ISDN 10 mg six times daily; the second group of patients (9 patients, group B) was treated with N 20 mg six times daily, V 120 mg four times daily and ISDN 20 mg six times daily; the third group of patients (10 patients, group C) was treated with N r 20 mg four times daily, V r 120 mg three times daily and ISDN sr 40 mg four times daily. The daily frequency of ischaemic episodes (IE) was assessed by Holter monitoring. The effect of each drug on the mean frequency of IE was compared with the placebo using a one-way analysis of variance and the Newman-Keuls test. In group A, the mean daily frequency of IE per patient was 8.1 ± 5.9 with the placebo, 1.4 ± 1.9 with N (P>0.001; −82%), 4 ± 3.6 with V (P: NS; −50%) and 4.3 ± 3.6 with ISDN (P: NS; −46%). In group B it was 6.4 ± 3.4 with the placebo, 0.5 ± 1.6 with N (P>0.01; −91%), 0.3 ± 0.5 with V (P>0.01; −95%) and 1.2 ± 1 with ISDN (P>0.01; −82%). In group C it was 10.3 ± 8.7 with the placebo, 0.7 ± 1.6 with N r (P>0.01; −93%), 1 ± 2.5 with V r (P>0.01; −90%) and 5.1 ± 7.7 with ISDN sr (P: NS; −50%). In group A a reduction of 100% in the number of recorded IES was achieved in 5/10 patients by using N, in none by V, and in 1/10 by ISDN. In group B, in 8/9 patients by N, in 6/9 by V and in 3/9 by ISDN. In group C, in 8/10 patients by both N r and V r in 4/10 patients by ISDN sr. It is concluded that calcium antagonist drugs at adequate dosages are substantially more effective than ISDN in relieving angina at rest and thus they may be considered as first choice therapy in the management of angina at rest. Furthermore, long-acting preparations of both nifedipine and verapamil were comparably effective in reducing the frequency of IE whereas isosorbide dinitrate, in the sustained release form, was again less effective.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical characteristics associated with sudden death in patients with variant angina.Circulation, 1982
- Randomized double-blind comparison of nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate therapy in variant angina pectoris due to coronary artery spasmAmerican Heart Journal, 1982
- Frequency response characteristics of ambulatory ECG monitoring systems and their implications for ST segment analysisAmerican Heart Journal, 1982
- Vasospastic ischemic mechanism of frequent asymptomatic transient ST-T changes during continuous electrocardiographic monitoring in selected unstable angina patientsAmerican Heart Journal, 1982
- Short-term efficacy of oral verapamil in rest anginaThe American Journal of Medicine, 1981
- Verapamil therapy in variant angina pectoris refractory to nitratesAmerican Heart Journal, 1981
- Effect of diltiazem in patients with variant angina: A randomized double-blind trialAmerican Heart Journal, 1981
- A Controlled Trial of Verapamil for Prinzmetal's Variant AnginaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- Treatment of variant angina with drugs: a survey of 11 cardiology institutes in Japan.Circulation, 1981
- Nifedipine Therapy for Coronary-Artery SpasmNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980