Laboratory monitoring of warfarin therapy in Utah
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Hematology
- Vol. 45 (1) , 85-87
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.2830450114
Abstract
Accurate laboratory monitoring of oral anticoagulation has been emphasized as an important factor in providing safe and effective therapy for patients with thromboembolism. However, recent reports indicate that coagulation laboratories may not be providing optimal clinical information to clinicians who treat these patients. We surveyed all hospltal coagulation laboratories in Utah to determine their format for reporting prothrombin time results in patients receiving oral anticoagulants. We found that less than 50% of laboratories used the reliable reporting format, i.e., the interational Normalized Ratio (INR), and that many of the laboratories using the INR format may be reporting incorrect values. Our survey also found a significant lack of interest by physicians in requesting that their laboratories adopt reliable reporting methods. These results indicate a substantial lack of understanding by laboratories and clinicians of the importance of using reliable methods to monitor oral anticoagulation. Significant educational efforts will be required to correct this problem.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Oral AnticoagulantsChest, 1992
- Imprecision of Prothrombin Time Monitoring of Oral Anticoagulation: A Survey of Hospital LaboratoriesAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1992
- Inadequate monitoring of warfarin dosage [letter] [see comments]Blood, 1992
- Reliance on Prothrombin Time Ratios Causes Significant Errors in Anticoagulation TherapyArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1992
- Optimal Therapeutic Range for Oral AnticoagulantsChest, 1989
- Dosage and control of oral anticoagulants: an international collaborative surveyBritish Journal of Haematology, 1982